Obama is pro-abortion. He's the most radical pro-abortion president in the history of the United States.
Today, in an editorial, Obama mouthpiece the New York Times is showing its desperation to stop women from bailing on Obama, because we all know how much women love abortion.
New York Times: Romney "would move to take away a fundamental right that American women have had for nearly 40 years.” OFA.BO/3MuLBt
— Barack Obama (@BarackObama) October 16, 2012
It is no secret that Mitt Romney and his running-mate, Representative Paul Ryan, are opponents of abortion rights. When Mr. Ryan was asked at last week’s debate whether voters who support abortion rights should be worried if the Romney-Ryan ticket were elected, he essentially said yes.This is BS.
They would depart slightly from the extremist Republican Party platform by allowing narrow exceptions for rape, incest or the life of the woman. Beyond that, they would move to take away a fundamental right that American women have had for nearly 40 years.
Mr. Romney has called for overturning Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court ruling that recognized a woman’s constitutional right to make her own childbearing decisions and to legalized abortion nationwide. He has said that the issue should be thrown back to state legislatures. The actual impact of that radical rights rollback is worth considering.
It would not take much to overturn the Roe decision. With four of the nine members of the Supreme Court over 70 years old, the next occupant of the White House could have the opportunity to appoint one or more new justices. If say, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the oldest member, retired and Mr. Romney named a replacement hostile to abortion rights, the basic right to abortion might well not survive.
As long as the John "Let's call ObamaCare a tax" Roberts is around, Roe v. Wade isn't going anywhere.
"The basic right to abortion" - how offensive is that?
Is the "basic right to abortion" a God-given right?
In any event, before Roe v. Wade, abortion was legal in this country. If it were overturned, abortion would still be legal. It would be an issue for the states. Wow. That's scary.
I don't consider the slaughter of the unborn a "fundamental right."
That's ghoulish.
LIFE, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
I guess the pro-abortion contingent considers killing the weak, the vulnerable, and the unborn pursuing happiness.
#obamapolicyfailures Most pro-abortion prez in history; Taxpayer$$ 2 pay 4 abortions; ObamaCare; HHS Mandate assault on Religious Liberty
— WisconsinRightToLife (@WRTL) October 16, 2012
"If [my daughters] make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby."
--BARACK OBAMA
